Phone: 0330 999 0959 | Email:

Divorce and Shared Property – Who Pays the Bills when one of you Moves Out?

Who Pays the Bills when one of you Moves Out?

Bills and finances

Divorce or separation can cause a few practical issues, alongside the emotional ones you may encounter. One common dilemma that arises when a couple separates is determining who is responsible for the bills when one of you moves out of the property. This blog aims to shed light on this issue and explore potential solutions.

Who is Responsible?

When it comes to determining financial responsibilities for bills and expenses, the dynamics can vary significantly based on whether you’re dealing with owned property or rented property. The criteria will also differ with regard to Mortgages vs Utilities. To get a better understanding of these distinctions, let’s break it down.

Owned Property

When a couple owns a home jointly and one person moves out, the financial responsibility for the property doesn’t immediately change. Both parties still have responsibilities. Let’s look at a few scenarios starting with Mortgages:

Mortgage in both names

When it comes to the mortgage on a jointly owned property and one person moving out following a separation, the financial obligations of both parties to pay for the mortgage remain the same.

Mortgage Obligations: In the context of jointly owned property, the mortgage is typically held jointly by both spouses. Even if one person moves out, both parties are still legally bound to fulfil the mortgage payments. The mortgage lender does not typically release one person from their financial commitment solely because they are no longer living in the property.

Joint Financial Liability: Divorce or separation does not automatically absolve one party of their financial liability concerning the mortgage. Legally, both individuals are still bound by the original financial agreements associated with the property.

Implications: If one party relocates and ceases to contribute to the mortgage payments, this can have significant legal and financial implications. It might lead to disputes, negatively impact credit scores, and even result in legal action or repossession, if the mortgage payments are not made as agreed.

In essence, when one person moves out of a jointly owned property following a divorce, it underscores the necessity for clear communication and agreements between both parties regarding how these mortgage-related financial responsibilities will be managed. Consulting with legal and financial professionals is advisable to navigate this situation effectively and explore potential options, such as refinancing the mortgage, selling the property, or transferring ownership as part of the divorce settlement.

Remember, parties in a shared mortgage are jointly and severally liable for the full mortgage payment. Not just 50% of it. This means, irrespective of whether you are living in the property or not, the mortgage company can seek repayments from you.


In family law, when one spouse refuses to pay the mortgage on a jointly owned property, the court can issue legally binding orders mandating the responsible party to continue payments. These orders may allow the other spouse to make direct payments to the mortgage company, ensuring the property’s financial stability. Non-compliance with court orders can lead to legal consequences, such as wage deductions or asset seizure.

Mortgage in one name

In contrast, if the property is solely owned by your spouse, and you are relocating due to divorce, the dynamics regarding the mortgage shift significantly. In this case, as the sole owner, your spouse would typically bear the legal responsibility for the property.

Implications: This shift in ownership has several important implications. First, it means that your spouse is solely responsible for making the mortgage payments. Any financial arrangements or negotiations regarding the mortgage and the property’s future fall primarily on their shoulders.

For you, as the person moving out, this can provide relief from direct mortgage responsibility. However, you need to be aware of the potential consequences. For instance, your spouse may have to refinance the mortgage or, in some cases, sell the property to manage the financial burden on their own.

Remember : Under family law whose name is on the mortgage or who has been paying the mortgage can make little difference to whether you have a claim on the property or not. Seek legal advice to find out what you may be entitled to. In some cases you may be advised to register an interest in a property you do not own, to ensure your rights are maintained.

Rented Property

When a couple rents a property, the view differs significantly, especially if only one person’s name is on the lease. The situation becomes more complex.

If one person moves out and their name is not on the lease, they may have a legal basis to discontinue their financial contributions. However, this should be done with careful consideration of any personal agreements made with the leaseholder and to ensure that rent and lease obligations are met.

Lease in one name

When one person is in the situation of moving out after a separation in a rented property where only their name appears on the lease, the legal dynamics primarily favour the leaseholder. Here’s an in-depth look at the implications of this scenario:

Sole Lease Responsibility: When only one person’s name is on the lease, it signifies that they are the sole tenant legally bound to the lease terms. This includes paying the rent and complying with all other conditions outlined in the lease agreement. The person whose name is on the lease is the primary tenant, making them solely responsible for rent payments and lease compliance.

Legal Obligations of the Non-Leaseholder: The person who is not named on the lease, often referred to as the non-leaseholder, generally does not have a direct legal obligation to the landlord. Legally, they are not considered tenants by the landlord, and the lease agreement does not apply to them. This can be an advantage if the non-leaseholder is planning to move out since they are not legally obligated to fulfil lease terms.

Private Agreements: In this scenario, the couple may have formed private agreements to manage financial responsibilities, including rent and living expenses. These private arrangements might specify how the non-leaseholder contributes to the rent and other costs, and they are enforceable outside of the formal lease agreement.  It is important for both parties to communicate openly and uphold these agreements to prevent potential disputes.

Lease in both names

When one person is faced with the situation of moving out after a separation, it is important to recognise that they remain financially responsible. The leaseholder who is relocating cannot simply cease their financial obligations without consequences.

Equal Financial Responsibilities: In the case of a joint lease, both parties share equal financial responsibilities. Both individuals are legally bound to the landlord as joint tenants, which means they both bear equal responsibility for upholding the lease terms.

Rent Obligations: The shared responsibility extends to rent payments. In a joint lease, both parties are legally obligated to ensure that rent is paid promptly and in full. The leaseholder doesn’t have sole responsibility for this financial obligation; it is shared equally with the co-tenant.

If the person moving out fails to contribute their share of rent or living expenses, it can result in disputes and tensions between the former partners. Moreover, if the leaseholder does not meet their financial responsibilities, it can negatively affect the credit and rental history of both individuals. This could impact their ability to secure future housing or credit.




Along with the Mortgage/Rental payments, you are likely to have utilities to pay. These utility bills are essential for the proper functioning and upkeep of a property, and their costs can vary. These costs include gas and electricity, water, council tax, internet/phone lines, and maintenance and ground rent . Arrangements, such as how these utilities are split, is often a matter agreed upon privately between the separating couple.

Utilities In Joint Names

When one person moves out of a property, and the utilities are in joint names, the shared responsibilities may continue even if one person moves out.

Shared Utility Responsibilities: In the case of utilities, both individuals who are named on the utility accounts are jointly responsible for ensuring these bills are paid.

coins and bank notesFinancial Implications: If the person moving out ceases their contributions to these utility bills, it can result in financial implications for both parties. Failure to pay the bills can lead to late fees, service interruptions, and negatively impact credit scores, as utility payment histories are sometimes reported to credit bureaus.

Resolution:  It’s advisable for both parties to discuss and agree on how utility bills will be managed during and after the separation. Mediation can be an effective means of reaching a mutually agreeable arrangement to prevent financial disputes.

Utilities In a Single name

In the scenario when one person moves out of a property after a separation, and the utilities are solely in one person’s name, it shifts the responsibility primarily to the individual whose name is on the accounts. They will bear the sole legal responsibility for ensuring that these bills are paid on time and in full.


While general principles apply, exceptions can arise depending on certain factors,  individual circumstances, and the specific agreements made between the parties involved.

Legal Agreements: If there are prenuptial agreements, postnuptial agreements, or specific legal contracts in place that outline how property-related expenses and responsibilities will be managed during a separation, these agreements should take precedence.

Mediation and Private Agreements: If the parties involved have reached a mediation or private agreement regarding property expenses and utilities, these agreements can influence how responsibilities are divided and may provide exceptions to the general guidelines.

Court Orders: If a court has issued specific orders related to property division and utility payments, these orders must be followed, and they can take precedence over other arrangements or defaults.

Cohabitation Agreements: In cases where couples have cohabitation agreements that dictate financial responsibilities during cohabitation and separation, these agreements may provide exceptions to the standard rules.

It’s important to get legal advice, to understand your specific situation and any applicable exceptions or legal considerations. Additionally, family mediation can be a valuable tool for reaching agreements that align with the unique circumstances of the individuals involved.

Addressing Financial Responsibilities

From shared bills to the fine print on property ownership, understanding how these aspects will be managed when one person moves out is important. Here are some options on how these matters can be addressed.

1) Family Mediation: Mediation is an effective approach to address the issue through open and honest communication between both parties. With the assistance of a trained mediator, you can negotiate a financial arrangement that works for both sides. This might include splitting expenses equally, in proportion to income, or based on individual usage, all while ensuring that the outcome is agreeable to both parties.

2) Property Agreement: In some cases, couples create a formal property agreement or a cohabitation agreement when they purchase a home together. This document can be structured to outline how financial responsibilities will be divided if the relationship ends, ensuring that both parties have a voice in the decision-making process.

3) Legal Recourse: If negotiations or mediation do not lead to a resolution, you might consider seeking legal recourse through the court system to determine financial responsibility. However, this can be a costly and lengthy process, often best reserved as a last resort.


woman paying billsIn the challenging context of separation or divorce, the question of ‘who pays the bills’ is a complex issue. It is important for both parties to address this concern promptly and fairly, either through negotiation, formal agreements, or, when necessary, legal intervention.

The bottom line is, under family law, the fact you are no longer cohabiting does not mean you have no legal responsibility to cover or help towards the rent, mortgage or utility bills.

Part of working through a separation or divorce is to help you both move on with your lives. Negative impacts on your credit rating and mortgage or rent arrears in your name will reduce the number of options you have to move on with your lives and make sure you are both housed in the future.

Family mediation is an effective solution to facilitate these discussions, helping couples reach mutually agreeable resolutions while maintaining a more amicable relationship throughout the process. You can book an emergency financial meeting, once both MIAMs are completed, just to discuss who will pay the rent, mortgage or utilities, whilst everything else is being resolved.

Remember that seeking legal counsel or consulting with a family mediator can provide you with the guidance and support necessary to navigate these issues successfully, ensuring a smoother transition during this challenging time.


Related Posts

We can resolve your financial, property or parenting issues amicably, cost effectively and fairly

Book Your Consultation Here
Contact us to find out more about why mediation can help your case. 0330 999 0959 or email

How can Mediation Help?

We can help resolve your Financial, Property or Parenting issues, amicably, cost effectively and fairly.